I'm kind of glad the web is sort of totally anarchic. That's fine with me.
From Roger Ebert
If a movie isn't a hit right out of the gate, they drop it. Which means that the whole mainstream Hollywood product has been skewed toward violence and vulgar teen comedy.
If Hollywood stars speak out, so do all sorts of other people. Now Hollywood stars can get a better hearing.
It's a good question, because a movie isn't good or bad based on its politics. It's usually good or bad for other reasons, though you might agree or disagree with its politics.
It's funny that there was so much disturbance about having a Catholic in the White House with Kennedy, and when we finally get a religion in the White House that's causing a lot of conflicts, and concerns, and disturbances for a lot of people, it's in the Bush Administration.
Movies absorb our attention more completely, I think.
The Academy is paranoid about its image.
The movies that are made more thoughtfully or made or with more ambition often get just get drowned out by the noise.
The right really dominates radio, and it's amazing how much energy the right spends telling us that the press is slanted to the left when it really isn't. They want to shut other people up. They really don't understand the First Amendment.
We can now have action movies with two stars where one might be African American and one might be Asian American. One of them doesn't have to be white, and the other one doesn't have to be the ethnic sidekick. We're way over that. And I think it's happening in society, too.
11 perspectives
5 perspectives
4 perspectives
2 perspectives
1 perspectives