Historical experience shows that a crisis causes either a recovery or catastrophic consequences.
From Sergei Lavrov
We are categorically against proliferation of nuclear weapons.
When you buy a company at an auction, and you are committing yourself to pay some $300 million to the state because it was a privatization deal, and you don't pay it, is it OK? Isn't it something that deserves court procedures?
Even the state TV channels are not monolithic in their pro-government line, and the views they express are quite pluralistic.
Crimea was not a non-nuclear zone in an international law sense but was part of Ukraine, a state which doesn't possess nuclear arms.
Russia has every reason to dispose of its nuclear arsenal... to suit its interests and international legal obligations.
We have absolutely no intention of, or interest in, crossing Ukraine's borders.
Saddam Hussein was the one person after whom the United States went, and they ruined the country.
We are certain that Ukraine needs profound constitutional reform. In all fairness, we can't see any other way to ensure the stable development of Ukraine but to sign a federal agreement.
Russian citizens being attacked is an attack against the Russian Federation.
27 perspectives
11 perspectives
10 perspectives
9 perspectives
3 perspectives
2 perspectives
1 perspectives