If a policy is wrongheaded, feckless and corrupt, I take it personally and consider it a moral obligation to sound off and not shut up until it's fixed.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It's really important that policy be properly designed. It's not enough just to.. .get angry over a subject.
I am not going to stop speaking out on behalf of policies that I think are right - regardless of ideology, party or political expediency.
When the policy is controversial, you have to go out and defend it.
Reasonable people can reasonably disagree on policy.
Criticism of a policy is welcome. But in the garb of criticizing a policy, if you allege that the policy was made for corrupt purposes, I reject it.
Good people can disagree - all you want is honesty, because you know, if I disagree, I'm willing to debate you on that, and then let the public decide what's good policy and bad policy.
No policy that does not rest upon some philosophical public opinion can be permanently maintained.
I take policy seriously; I'm not just trying to be a political hack.
Our policy is very clear: whatever policy will suit the people, whatever policy will suit the circumstances, whatever policy will suit my state.
Well I've already made it clear that it's a matter for individuals in exercising their own judgement, their own consciences to speak freely on matters of policy.