Journalists couldn't do their jobs overseas without taking risks, and the same is true for diplomats and intelligence officers.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Journalists are in the same madly rocking boat as diplomats and statesmen. Like them, when the Cold War ended, they looked for a new world order and found a new world disorder. If making and conducting foreign policy in today's turbulent environment is difficult, so is practicing journalism.
We have to protect all journalists, and journalists have to be allowed to do their jobs.
Journalists must not be made accomplices by the secret service to solve its own problems.
Lawyers, judges, doctors, shrinks, accountants, investigators and, not least, journalists could not do the most basic tasks without a veil of secrecy. Why shouldn't the same be true of those professionals who happen to be government officials?
I think as journalists, we have to keep our distance from power.
U.S. journalists I don't think are very courageous. They tend to go along with the government's policy domestically and internationally. To question is seen as being unpatriotic, or potentially subversive.
The fact is, most journalists I know are not particularly political. They move around a lot.
I don't trust a lot of journalists.
Journalism, as concerns collecting information, differs little if at all from intelligence work. In my judgment, a journalist's job is very interesting.
Clearly independent journalists - domestic journalists - run a high risk if they dare to take on serious investigative work.