The content of most textbooks is perishable, but the tools of self-directedness serve one well over time.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Publishers, naturally, loathe used books and have developed strategies to depress the secondhand market. They bring out new, even more expensive editions of popular textbooks every three to four years, in a classic cycle of planned obsolescence.
Books are good enough in their own way, but they are a poor substitute for life.
Textbooks are going to remain a key part of learning. They just need to go digital, become more interactive and they need more analytics.
Textbooks are no longer given to schoolchildren; they're too expensive. So they're given to the teachers, who probably need them more.
I know in this time of great technological advancement, the idea of reading a book seems almost anachronistic, but I think it's worth preserving.
I was always taught that book keeping was more relevant than book reading. The only thing worth reading was meant to be a balance sheet.
I only keep books that I like very much. Otherwise I'd throw them out.
Digital texts are all well and good, but books on shelves are a presence in your life. As such, they become a part of your day-to-day existence, reminding you, chastising you, calling to you. Plus, book collecting is, hands down, the greatest pastime in the world.
I don't like books that seem to want to teach me things. Which is not to say that one doesn't learn from books - but you do your own learning in your own way.
I think that books are fundamentally educational.
No opposing quotes found.