I didn't need the insurance. I do it again if my DP tells me it didn't look good in the camera or if the actors didn't hit their marks. But if everything was working why do it again?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Even when I was a teen model, I didn't think it was fair that I had to enter the acting world to get insurance.
I wanted to become an actor so I didn't have to put on a suit and sell insurance.
We took the insurance companies out of the driver's seat.
Pre-existing conditions for those previously insured must not lead to someone being unable to get insurance.
Whenever I don't get injured, the film is a dud. I didn't bleed on 'Rhinestone.' I didn't bleed on 'Stop! Or My Mom will Shoot.'
When people used to ask me why I got involved with Hollywood films, I would say jokingly that it was for the health insurance.
There's only one shot you have at a movie, and that's your best shot. If you can't give it that, don't go. They're paying you! You gotta do a job for them.
Every time I get photographed, it's the legs. So I've insured them for a lot, for £5 million each. Is that enough?
You get to the middle of a take that's going really well and the camera will run out of film. They have to stop you, apologize and then you've got to get things going all over again.
You play a part, and as soon as a movie is over and the camera stops, you go home and you're not really responsible for what you've done.
No opposing quotes found.