And that Newman wasn't, and yet to me Pollock is just as radical and unlike Expressionism as Newman.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Pollock looks unusual and radical even now.
Pollock said several times that he couldn't separate himself from his art. Not knowing much about modern art when I began to read about him, I was much more his persona - his struggles as a human being - that was interesting to me.
Pollock was well known, certainly, but for all the wrong reasons. He was known as much for being wild and unconventional in his working methods as for being a great artist.
Pollock also... wanted one to be wrapped in the painting.
Clem had made it known that Pollock was a great painter.
In the late 30s the name Pollock was totally unknown and unheard of.
I think Paul Newman had an amazing career. I also love what Tom Hanks has done. He has always made very grounded movies that have something to say. He has found a way to make blockbusters that are about something and that is what I want to do.
In the past 10 years, I've looked at life as this Pollock stuff. And now I'm almost in the post Pollock phase.
I aspire to be like Paul Newman. He was a man's man, a lady's man, and the epitome of a philanthropist.
Growing up, Paul Newman seemed like the ultimate manly actor. And then, I got to work with him and we became friends, so that was nice.
No opposing quotes found.