For me, it makes sense to address shocking experiences through poems because of the way poems also have that effect on the reader.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Poetry, I think, intensifies the reader's experience. If it's a humorous facet of the story, poetry makes it more exuberant. If it's a sad facet, poetry can make it more poignant.
I think my poems immediately come out of the sensuous and emotional experiences I have.
Poetry is partly sympathy, don't you think? If it's any good, it gets people to think about others' points of view.
Poetry at its best can do you a lot of harm.
As a direct line to human feeling, empathic experience, genuine language and detail, poetry is everything that headline news is not. It takes us inside situations, helps us imagine life from more than one perspective, honors imagery and metaphor - those great tools of thought - and deepens our confidence in a meaningful world.
If poetry alters the way in which the reader views the world, then it has had its desired effect.
Hmmm. I think a lot of people can write poems that are howls of anguish. I think I've probably written such things and then torn them up.
Poetry is an orphan of silence. The words never quite equal the experience behind them.
Poetry should surprise by a fine excess and not by singularity, it should strike the reader as a wording of his own highest thoughts, and appear almost a remembrance.
Poetry may make us from time to time a little more aware of the deeper, unnamed feelings which form the substratum of our being, to which we rarely penetrate; for our lives are mostly a constant evasion of ourselves.
No opposing quotes found.