I strongly believe that the fundamental laws of nature are not emergent phenomena.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Understanding the laws of nature does not mean that we are immune to their operations.
Evolution is not a force but a process. Not a cause but a law.
Nothing exists from whose nature some effect does not follow.
No law of nature, however general, has been established all at once; its recognition has always been preceded by many presentiments.
Nature does not proceed by leaps and bounds.
To me there is nothing that goes against nature. If it seems incomprehensible, it's only because we haven't been able to understand it yet.
When we human beings hypothesize that a law of nature holds - even temporarily or situationally - we are creating an idea, but we are also making a hypothesis about how nature behaves, whose truth or usefulness has nothing to do with what we know or believe.
I think that the 'laws of nature' are also prone to evolve; I think they are more like habits than laws.
The laws of nature are structured so that we grow and change, and get to experience the full spectrum of biological existence.
The laws of nature are but the mathematical thoughts of God.