LNG is a fossil fuel. LNG is imported.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Any time and money spent on LNG is time and money not spent on renewable energy.
When it was first proposed, I was willing to support it as a 'transitional fuel' because it had some clear advantages for Hawaii. Much has changed since then. LNG will no longer save us any money.
It's time to focus all of our efforts on renewables. We will oppose the building of LNG facilities.
There is a reason it is called fossil fuel-it is an outdated method of getting power.
China and the U.S. are the two largest importers of oil. They are the two largest emitters of carbon.
I have reached the conclusion that Hawaii does not need LNG in our future.
Natural gas is a dirty fossil fuel like the rest of them.
The extraction of oil, coal and minerals brought, and still brings, a cost to the environment.
L.A. is conventional to a hyper-real degree. It's plastic.
We have more natural resources - coal, oil, wind - across the board not only to be energy independent but to be a leading exporter.
No opposing quotes found.