Waiter trainers claim that an investment in education pays off very quickly for restaurants.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Why can't teachers end up owning schools, the way waiters can open their own restaurants?
There's the common misconception that restaurants make a lot of money. It's not true. If you look at maybe the top chef in the world, or at least monetarily, it's like Wolfgang Puck, but he makes as much money as an average crappy investment banker.
My parents always encouraged us to get an education and establish a profession. However, my brothers and I grew up with considerable freedom, whether it was saving or spending our tips from the restaurant or our career choices.
I would say a full-time waiter in a high-price house could easily make $75,000, $80,000 a year.
Fortunately, I never had to do the waiter thing. When I got out of college, I immediately started to teach acting. One of the first jobs I had was in a federally-funded program where I taught drama to young people.
Once I was unemployed and didn't have money, you can't just go to dinner. The onus is on you to learn to cook... I learned how important the right equipment is.
Chefs have only been able to work in restaurants, high-end cuisine. Why? Why haven't they been able to find other scenarios? For those chefs who want to do avant-garde cuisine, should they be finding their income in a restaurant?
Some of the things I think I learned from that were very educational as far as just paying bills - the basics in dealing with a restaurant like that. It was just life - the education involved in running the organization, even on a small level.
Restaurants with small courses that give the customer choices, and that don't obligate them to spend a fortune, are going to do very well.
I learned more from the one restaurant that didn't work than from all the ones that were successes.
No opposing quotes found.