The court has to decide which of our approved desires has the better claim, right here, right now, and a court has to do more than read fairly when it makes this kind of choice.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
This pro-choice issue is a legal issue that should be decided by the courts.
The court makes an amazing amount of decisions that ought to be made by the people.
I have had to make a decision I may not agree with, but I am required to follow the letter of the law. It is not my job to think what is best... My responsibility is to decide what the law says and to decide to the law.
You can have many different selection systems, but the bottom line has to be a system that, once the judge takes office that judge will feel that he or she is to decide the case without reference to the popular thing or the popular will of the moment.
We're lawyers. We present the arguments, and the court sorts out the merits.
One cannot tell the High Court what to adjudicate. They must judge, and then the legislature must act accordingly.
Judges need to restrict themselves to the proper resolution of the case before them. They need to avoid the temptation to set broad policy.
To make a coverage decision, doesn't one have to make a medical judgment?
A judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case. The judge's only obligation - and it's a solemn obligation - is to the rule of law.
You're certain to get a decision in a trial.