It was a question of helping a man prepare in the way that suits him best. The theory is if you give a man responsibility for his own actions, then it is up to him to accept that responsibility.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Man is fully responsible for his nature and his choices.
To what extent is any given man morally responsible for any given act? We do not know.
Men must necessarily be the active agents of their own well-being and well-doing they themselves must in the very nature of things be their own best helpers.
Man is the result of a purposeless and materialistic process that did not have him in mind. He was not planned.
When a man asks himself what is meant by action he proves that he isn't a man of action. Action is a lack of balance. In order to act you must be somewhat insane. A reasonably sensible man is satisfied with thinking.
The duty of man is the same in respect to his own nature as in respect to the nature of all other things, namely not to follow it but to amend it.
A man generally has two reasons for doing a thing. One that sounds good, and a real one.
It's motive alone which gives character to the actions of men.
Men don't want any responsibility, and neither do I.
A man does what he must - in spite of personal consequences, in spite of obstacles and dangers and pressures - and that is the basis of all human morality.