As a historian, what I trust is my ability to take a mass of information and tell a story shaped around it.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
As an author of narrative history, I read a lot of history books.
I tend to like to read history - recent history, because I find that much more intriguing than just a writer's imagination.
I write about modern people who share a deep sense of connection to the mysteries of the past. I find that I understand myself and my world better when I'm able to peer into history as a mirror.
I write novels, mostly historical ones, and I try hard to keep them accurate as to historical facts, milieu and flavor.
The thing that most attracts me to historical fiction is taking the factual record as far as it is known, using that as scaffolding, and then letting imagination build the structure that fills in those things we can never find out for sure.
I find there's a thin, permeable membrane between journalism and history, and though some academic historians take a dim view of it, I gather a lot of strength and professional inspiration from passing back and forth across it.
I've never believed it's a fiction writer's job to create an exact replica of the past, a diorama the reader can step right into. But it is my responsibility to learn everything of the world I'm writing about, to become an expert in the politics and history that formed my characters' identities.
I can read a newspaper article, and it might trigger something else in my mind. I often like to choose in historical fiction things or subject matter I don't feel have been given a fair shake in history.
Story and plot, not historical facts, are the engine of a novel, but I was committed to working through the grain of actual history and coming to something, an overall effect, which approximated truth.
I am a historian. I do a lot of research, and I try to get it right.
No opposing quotes found.