Movies become art after editing. Instead of just reproducing reality, they juxtapose images of it. That implies expression; that's art.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Movies aren't just supposed to be a representation of reality. They're supposed to be an art.
Movies were never an art form, they were entertainment. It just evolved into an art form from there, and it's still evolving in different ways.
Reality in movies is the reality of the story you're telling, so it may not match the reality as we know it, but the reason there's art is that it tries to bring some kind of understanding of all the suffering and joys and pain that we go through. Storytelling brings some value to it.
With a movie you're creating from the beginning this particular work, let's not call it work of art, because very few movies are works of art, let's just call them bits of popular culture, whatever they are, sometimes very rarely by accident a movie becomes a work of art.
The essence of cinema is editing. It's the combination of what can be extraordinary images of people during emotional moments, or images in a general sense, put together in a kind of alchemy.
When you create a movie, you create something in your image.
Movies are art and the spirit of the movie depends on the creators.
Cinema is an art form.
You know, essentially when you do a play you're reinterpreting a work of art that already exists. That's not what happens with a movie.
Movies are an art form that is very available to the masses.
No opposing quotes found.