If I have my way, I'm going to dissolve the Forest Service. They're in the business of harvesting trees and they're not harvesting trees, so why have them anymore?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm not an extreme tree-hugger. I do believe trees grow and are a useful agricultural product that can be harvested without damaging the ecology and wildlife.
There's a basic kind of tension here. It's between those who say, I'd like to clear cut this forest and reduce it to saw timber because that's an economically productive thing for me to do.
I like trees because they seem more resigned to the way they have to live than other things do.
The places that are most likely to grow trees for carbon sequestration are places where trees aren't growing now.
Most people know that forests are the lungs of our planet, literally playing a critical role in every breath we take. And that they're also home to incredible animals like the orangutan and elephant, which will go extinct if we keep cutting down their forests.
Research gathered over recent years has highlighted the countless benefits to people, wildlife and the environment that come from planting trees and creating new woodland habitat. It's obvious trees are good things.
It is up to us as lawmakers to provide the resources and streamlined processes that will enable our federal forest managers to become the best possible steward of our lands.
Spring beckons! All things to the call respond; the trees are leaving and cashiers abscond.
Maintaining healthy forests is essential to those who make a living from the land and for those of us who use them for recreational purposes.
If you cut down a forest, it doesn't matter how many sawmills you have if there are no more trees.