All of the changes in publishing since 1960 are significant. There are far fewer publishers.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It seems the world of book publishing is constantly changing. Whether it was the rise of chain stores or their decline, or the digital revolution... fortunately, we have been able not only to adapt but to thrive.
Technology has changed the way book publishing works, as it has changed everything else in the world of media.
When there are fewer and fewer publishers of scale, it's just not good for authors.
There's almost no author alive who isn't weathering the tumultuous changes in the publishing industry.
Everywhere, publishers are being squeezed out.
It's not like publishing is perfect. Far from it. The industry is struggling to adapt and survive, and it's incredibly frustrating trying to break in.
The publishing industry has always wanted to make books as cheaply and as ephemerally as they could; it's nothing new.
What has been forgotten is that there were major intellectual breakthroughs in the 1960s, thanks to North American writers of an older generation. There was a rupture in continuity, since most young people influenced by those breakthroughs did not enter the professions.
There's been a growing dissatisfaction and distrust with the conventional publishing industry, in that you tend to have a lot of formerly reputable imprints now owned by big conglomerates.
Honestly, the essence of publishing hasn't changed. Since the days of the cave man carving stuff on the cave walls, people have wanted stories, and storytellers have wanted an audience. That is still the case. The changes are really a matter of format.
No opposing quotes found.