If an adult uses violence on a child, the child will naturally assume that he too, has the right to use it on one smaller or weaker.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There is a subconscious way of taking violence as a way of expression, as a normality, and it has a lot of effects in the youth in the way they absorb education and what they hope to get out of life.
The thing about a violent kid is that he can't play imaginatively.
Growing up in a violent home is a terrifying and traumatic experience that can affect every aspect of a child's life, growth, and development.
If you disapprove of violence, then you can't think there is any age when violence is appropriate.
It is the failing of youth not to be able to restrain its own violence.
Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.
There is an essential difference between someone who harms a child on purpose and someone who harms a child by accident during combat in civilian territory.
I just couldn't imagine hitting a child. But in 'The Slap' it's an extreme situation. You have to ask yourself - would you step in if a child was out of control?
Violence among young people is an aspect of their desire to create. They don't know how to use their energy creatively so they do the opposite and destroy.
The kid who can play imaginatively doesn't tend to be violent. It's the same with adults.