The demographic complexity of this country should be reflected not only at the end of the chain, but since the beginning, in order that more of these people can be excited and integrated.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
A lot of people in this country right now are living with multiple generations under one roof, struggling to make ends meet.
The constant effort towards population, which is found even in the most vicious societies, increases the number of people before the means of subsistence are increased.
The economic, social and cultural progress of a nation depends on citizens counting for more and having more rights.
Many developing countries are enjoying demographic changes. They have a younger demographic composition so they're not burdened by legacy policy. Now, if you combine this with a good macro policy and ambitious structural policy, those countries are able to move more flexibly and be more agile.
The problem with a purely collective system is not only that it requires economic growth, and the right sort of demographic trends, but that it prevents people thinking about their futures in a responsible way.
As a small country, both in size and population, our future hinges on the quality of our people.
We may consider each generation as a distinct nation, with a right, by the will of its majority, to bind themselves, but none to bind the succeeding generation, more than the inhabitants of another country.
This is not bad, but the pace of globalisation has surpassed the capacity of the system to adjust to new realities of a more interdependent and integrated world.
This nation is never finished. It has to be re-created in each generation.
We are a heterogeneous society. We have to accept that. Growth has to be such that the most backward sections also benefit from it. Otherwise, it will be a very imbalanced growth.
No opposing quotes found.