Surrealism - in particular with Salvador Dali - was all about ego. It was all about extreme individualism.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Dali was the great painter then and surrealism was a way of life.
I think it was more personal, but I certainly tried to adapt certain concepts of Surrealism.
The end of the surrealism movement was so political, so artistically pure.
As far as the style, I was fascinated by surrealism.
Surrealism had a great effect on me because then I realised that the imagery in my mind wasn't insanity. Surrealism to me is reality.
Surrealism was necessary - essential, even - in the 1920s to bridge the gap between rationalism and the subconscious. It started something important. But by the early '60s, it had become petit-bourgeois; it was too intellectual and romantic, and had ground to a halt. It had become respectable.
The surrealists, and the modern movement in painting as a whole, seemed to offer a key to the strange postwar world with its threat of nuclear war. The dislocations and ambiguities, in cubism and abstract art as well as the surrealists, reminded me of my childhood in Shanghai.
Really, I do not know whether my paintings are surrealist or not, but I do know that they are the frankest expression of myself.
Surrealism is a bourgeois disaffection; that its militants thought it universal is only one of the signs that it is typically bourgeois.
The poetry and transgression that was so much of surrealism's anarchic force has been recruited into mainstream culture. It has been made commonplace by television and magazine merchandising, by computer games and Internet visuals, by film and MTV, by the fashion shoot.
No opposing quotes found.