Quote

In some instances, the accuracy of past-life memories can be objectively verified, sometimes with remarkable detail.

Of course, there will always be those who look only at technique, who ask 'how', while others of a more curious nature will ask 'why'. Personally, I have always preferred inspiration to information.

You can have data without information, but you cannot have information without data.

These rare senses and powers of reasoning were given to be used freely, but not audaciously, to discover, not to pervert the truth.

And the user may have a higher comfort level deciding what information to provide rather than worrying about what inferences might be made from what they've gathered.

There is no knowledge, no light, no wisdom that you are in possession of, but what you have received it from some source.

Technologies like Ayasdi's exist now to automatically discover information from data without having someone making guesses up front.

The proper method for inquiring after the properties of things is to deduce them from experiments.

In reply, I can only plead that a discovery which seems to contradict the general tenor of previous investigations is naturally received with much hesitation.