Getting straight A's for having lots of tests is not the same as getting A's on the tests. Weighing a malnourished dog every day doesn't make him any better.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm the type of person, I have to study to get an A on the test.
If I knew I was positive, why would I have ever gone to PAW to take a test?
President Obama still places far too much emphasis on relentless testing with standardized exams.
The one size fits all approach of standardized testing is convenient but lazy.
Dogmatism makes for scientific anemia.
But the person who scored well on an SAT will not necessarily be the best doctor or the best lawyer or the best businessman. These tests do not measure character, leadership, creativity, perseverance.
Animal testing is needless, especially in cosmetics.
I am a really bad test taker. I can get straight As in school, but I get nervous on test.
Perhaps measuring animal intelligence by comparing it to human intelligence isn't the best litmus test.
I hate tests. It's a really lousy way to judge a person's ability.