I don't think we need political activists on the Supreme Court or any other level of court.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The Supreme Court needs jurists, not politicians.
Justices are not politicians. They don't run on a political platform, and senators should not ask them to do so.
The Supreme Court is not elected, and it is therefore not a proper arbiter of social policy.
There can be no activist judges from any political party.
The Supreme Court is not the impetus for constitutional change - we are.
Of course, conservatives always claim to be against judicial activism.
I think there needs to be a range of justices, of all types. You can't just pick one type.
The Constitution is not a panacea for every blot upon the public welfare. Nor should this Court, ordained as a judicial body, be thought of as a general haven for reform movements.
It is not the role of Congress to decide legal cases between private parties. That is why we have courts.
If the court is a political institution making important political decisions, then the public should debate the politics of Supreme Court decisions.