Who shall decide when doctors disagree, And soundest casuists doubt, like you and me?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Doctors are human; they make mistakes, and you have to stay on top of them. You have to ask the second question, the third question, the follow-up to the fourth question.
The patient's autonomy always, always should be respected, even if it is absolutely contrary - the decision is contrary to best medical advice and what the physician wants.
I truly feel the best doctors are ones who are criticized by nurses, patients and family. They do not make excuses and learn from their mistakes.
Good physicians are rarely dispassionate. They agonize and self-doubt over patients.
I've learnt some important lessons: I never rely on the opinion of one doctor alone. I do my own research; I read up and am ready with questions I need answered.
I don't necessarily want my physician making all my decisions.
The doctors, whether based in Brussels or Paris, draw the same conclusions and write the same prescriptions.
If 98 out of 100 doctors tell me I've got a problem, I should take their advice. And if those two other doctors get paid by Big Snack Food, like certain climate deniers get paid by Big Coal, I shouldn't take their advice.
I'm strongly for a patient Bill of Rights. Decisions ought to be made by doctors, not accountants.
Our great struggle in medicine these days is not just with ignorance and uncertainty. It's also with complexity: how much you have to make sure you have in your head and think about. There are a thousand ways things can go wrong.
No opposing quotes found.