The whole 'studly womaniser' thing, I mean, I quite enjoy the title - it's just not very accurate.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
For a while, I was nervous about portraying women because of the objectification that automatically comes with it, whether the artist intends or not.
My entire career stands on the strong pillars of women-oriented films. This stems from the fact that I am sensitive to the entire aura and mystique of a woman and womanhood.
I think there is an enormous appetite for great roles for women.
So many roles for women demand that you make the audience fall in love with you or sympathise with you.
The parts for women, you're either like the quietly suffering wife or the wild girl.
Womanhood is something you don't consider until it hits you.
I think there is an enormous appetite for great roles for women. You can see that clearly with things like 'The Hunger Games.'
I like titles that are a little difficult, because it's kind of counterintuitive.
What is interesting to me is looking at how male and female writers depict men who, come in behind to fill those domestic duties, deal with personal and cultural lack of respect for doing what is lingeringly perceived as 'women's work.'
Nobody is surprised that women writers accurately represent male characters over and over again, no doubt because everybody knows that women understand men much better than vice-versa.