A person who's only suffering can't write a poem. There are choices to be made, and you need to be objective.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
You don't have to suffer to be a poet; adolescence is enough suffering for anyone.
Suffering is too strong a word, but writing is serious work. I pull the stuff up from me - it's not as if it's a pleasure.
When I was a young man, I understood that poetry was two things - it was difficult to understand, but you could understand that the poet was miserable. So for a while there, I wrote poems that were hard to understand, even by me, but gave off whiffs of misery.
One can't write for all readers. A poet cannot write for people who don't like poetry.
I have experienced healing through other writers' poetry, but there's no way I can sit down to write in the hope a poem will have healing potential. If I do, I'll write a bad poem.
I think we have a creative impulse where suffering can magnify our work, but so can joy. You can be in love and write the greatest love song ever. Sometimes I think too much suffering makes it difficult to do one's work.
Poetry is the hardest thing that there is. It fascinates me, so I want to write more of it.
What is a poet? An unhappy person who conceals profound anguish in his heart but whose lips are so formed that as sighs and cries pass over them they sound like beautiful music.
None but a poet can write a tragedy. For tragedy is nothing less than pain transmuted into exaltation by the alchemy of poetry.
Hmmm. I think a lot of people can write poems that are howls of anguish. I think I've probably written such things and then torn them up.