What this means is that we shouldn't abbreviate the truth but rather get a new method of presentation.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Once we thought, journalists and readers alike, that if we put together enough 'facts' and gave them a fast stir, we would come up with something that, at least by the standards of short-order cooks, could be called the truth.
The opportunity to declare a truth may come when we least expect it. Let us be prepared.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Expressing truth is hard work.
I don't believe truth is conveyed by style and presentation. I don't think that if it was grainy and full of handheld material, it would be any more truthful.
What I'm dealing with is so vast and great that it can't be called the truth. It's above the truth.
Truth is simply a compliment paid to sentences seen to be paying their way.
Usually we are saying only part of the truth.
Truth implies meaning.
When the truth is spoken, it doesn't need to be adorned. It just needs to be simply stated, and often it only needs to be said once.