The speculative part of my work is that these particular cognitive tasks - ways of thinking analytically - are tied to nature's laws.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
My idea here is that, inasmuch as certain cognitive tasks and principles are tied to nature's laws, these tasks and principles are indifferent to language, culture, gender, or the particular mode of information that is provided.
The laws of nature are but the mathematical thoughts of God.
It is one thing for the human mind to extract from the phenomena of nature the laws which it has itself put into them; it may be a far harder thing to extract laws over which it has no control.
The laws of nature are structured so that we grow and change, and get to experience the full spectrum of biological existence.
My feeling is that scientific method has the power to account for and interlink all phenomena in the universe, including its origin, using the laws of nature. But that still leaves the laws unexplained.
When we human beings hypothesize that a law of nature holds - even temporarily or situationally - we are creating an idea, but we are also making a hypothesis about how nature behaves, whose truth or usefulness has nothing to do with what we know or believe.
Our ideas must be as broad as Nature if they are to interpret Nature.
The method of nature: who could ever analyze it?
The more we learn of science, the more we see that its wonderful mysteries are all explained by a few simple laws so connected together and so dependent upon each other, that we see the same mind animating them all.
Analysis I take to be a scientific procedure. What I do is creative. It doesn't spring from the same part of the mind.