With Instagram, you're captioning a moment. Twitter is the caption without the image. Even if it's there, the words come first.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
'Instagram' is a media company. I think we're about visual media. I explain ourselves as a disruptive entertainment platform that enables communication through visual media. I don't think it's just photos.
I can't figure Twitter out. The way Twitter is formatted, I can't tell who is saying something and who's replying to something. I don't know who the tweeter is and who's responding to the twit.
'What is Twitter?' has always been a tough question to answer.
Instagram is a media company. I think we're about visual media.
When people come to Twitter and they want to express something in the world, the technology fades away. It's them writing a simple message and them knowing that people are going to see it.
Calling 'Instagram' a photo-sharing app is like calling a newspaper a letter-sharing book, or a Mozart grand era symphony a series of notes. 'Instagram' is less about the medium and more about the network.
I don't look at Instagram. I don't have much to do with social media.
I don't tweet. I prefer face-to-face communication and sometimes Instagram.
I have a Twitter, but I'm not a tweeter... if that really makes sense.
I love Instagram - I don't actually go on Twitter and tweet; I just connect it through my Instagram account. I think it's a good way of getting stuff out there and connecting with people.