I intend to leave after my death a large fund for the promotion of the peace idea, but I am skeptical as to its results.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It's important to do see the results of your philanthropy while you are alive.
I'm not a trust-fund type.
I have entered the field to die, if need be, for this government, and never expect to return to peaceful pursuits until the object of this war of preservation has become a fact established.
It's an incredible con job when you think about it, to believe something now in exchange for something after death. Even corporations with their reward systems don't try to make it posthumous.
In exile, I have tried to profit by the past and prepare for the future.
Usually, people in the Islamic world set aside one-third or one-fourth of their wealth for endowment, and that will be effective only after their death. But in my case, I decided to implement this decision in my lifetime itself.
I always knew my death would be a possible consequence of the work I do. But for me it was a price I was willing to pay because this is what I believed in.
More effective than giving away half my fortune before I die is finding a way to help people have a good-paying job.
I have committed to giving away 80% of my wealth, much of it in India, but also in other countries.
I'm not resigned, but I'm realistic too. The statistics in my case are very poor. Not many people come through esophageal cancer and live to talk about it, or not for long. And the other wager is, the part of the wager, it's a certainty you'll have a terrible time and you may wish you were dying because it's an awful process.
No opposing quotes found.