For me writing biographies is impossible, unless they are brief and concise, and these are, I feel, the most eloquent.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I'm not fond of biographies. I don't like writing about myself.
I hate biographies which say, I was called to such and such an office, and he offered me so and so, and I got so and so money. I find that very tedious. The best biographies are written by other people.
Great writing can be done in biography, history, art.
Biographies are no longer written to explain or explore the greatness of the great. They redress balances, explore secret weaknesses, demolish legends.
I've always had an abundance of material about the subjects of my biographies.
I think anything that anyone writes that's any good is going to have a lot of autobiography.
I love long sentences. My big heroes of fiction writing are Henry James and Proust - people who recognise that life doesn't consist of declarative statements, but rather modifications, qualifications and feelings.
There are a few writers whose lives and personalities are so large, so fascinating, that there's no such thing as a boring biography of them - you can read every new one that comes along, good or bad, and be caught up in the story all over again.
I don't think of my books as being biographies. I never had any interest in doing a book just to write the life of a great man. I had zero interest in that. My interest is in power. How power works.
I see myself as writing biographies, the complete story of someone's life.