I'm baffled that Mark Greenberg would send an offensive email politicizing the beheading of an American journalist.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I don't think any of us are careful enough about emails. When you are writing an email, you should imagine yourself in an auditorium speaking to 5,000 people, with your mother and grandmother in the audience, and it is being broadcast on CNN.
The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information.
There should be no censorship of mail.
Hillary Clinton and her media machine try to dismiss, but anybody who understands anything about how email works - and this is millennials in particular, who grew up on the Internet - know that you're an idiot to keep sensitive information on a server in your house.
Most people are not shocked that I am occasionally rude to journalists. They are probably amazed I don't punch one in the face.
I'm never surprised by the insensitivity of 'The New York Times' editorial board.
I would like to know that when I read the paper in the morning, it's telling me something that actually happened, and I think the vast majority of journalists want the same thing.
What I think is highly inappropriate is what's going on across the Internet, a kind of political jihad against Dan Rather and CBS News that's quite outrageous.
One of the problems that we have as American journalists is that we bring the American cultural baggage with us and we plop it down and it follows us around and that's just a fact of life.
In a fascist shift, reporters start to face more and more harassment, and they have to be more and more courageous simply in order to do their jobs.
No opposing quotes found.