Pundits are used to analyzing the gap between what our ideals suggest and what our security interests require.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm not a political pundit.
Anyone with an Internet service provider can be a pundit or whatever they want.
I'm not a pundit. I'm not an analyst.
I'm not a policymaker, I'm not a pundit. In fact, I don't have any interest in it. It's not on my agenda.
I feel no compulsion to be a pundit. As a matter of fact, I really don't have that much to say about most things. Working with hard news satisfies me completely.
It's actually harder than it looks to be a good pundit on the air. You've got to have stuff to say.
We're obviously in a strange environment where practically anyone can set themselves up as a pundit of sorts. It's all about sorting the wheat from the chaff, and I'm very interested in reading different points of view, and certainly different generations than my own that have such a very different world view.
The pun exists in a social and political void, caring nothing for the issues of its day, content merely to display itself in its small cleverness.
The American people demand results, not rhetoric, especially when it comes to national security issues.
The preservation of our national security and the laws that define us as the United States of America demand that we understand the intersection of the two - indeed, how they reinforce one another.
No opposing quotes found.