Huge numbers of embassy cables are labeled 'unclassified' or 'limited official use' and deal with mundane matters.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Why are diplomatic cables secret at all?
In most cases, cables are marked secret not because the U.S. requires it but because those speaking to us - the foreign leaders across the table - do. They are not keeping secrets from us, but from two other groups: their enemies and their subjects.
The whole notion of an embassy is like 'The Other.' That's what makes Washington interesting.
The question really is how do we get Embassy Officers into the minds of the American business community. That is a much more difficult task than understanding a statistical matrix.
My life experience confirms that the U.S. government frequently overclassifies data. But that's a stronger argument for not dumping large volumes of government traffic on an unclassified personal server than it is a justification for retroactively challenging classification decisions.
Most other documents leaked to WikiLeaks do not carry the same explosive potential as candid cables written by American diplomats.
I will not comment on or confirm what are alleged to be stolen State Department cables. But I can say that the United States deeply regrets the disclosure of any information that was intended to be confidential, including private discussions between counterparts or our diplomats' personal assessments and observations.
There are some classified documents there that we received from the CIA. Our arrangement with the CIA was that we could by mutual agreement declassify these documents, but we had no authority to unilaterally declassify them.
In the best of all worlds everyone in the Embassy is doing something to assist U.S. exports.
It's a necessary quality of a diplomat or a politician that he will compromise. Uncompromising politicians or diplomats get you into the most terrible trouble.
No opposing quotes found.