I'm just curious, who's more fit to raise a child? A loving committed same-sex couple or an unmarried 15-year-old with no income and really no skills to parent?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I personally would rather raise my child in New York. It seems like it would be easier to make sure she or he gets a whole bunch of experience and understanding of the world. But, people in general think it's easier to raise a kid when you don't have so much stuff in your face.
In a situation where it's the child or the adult, I'm going with the child.
Date a woman with children only if you are ready to man up, because it's a position that comes with responsibility.
It's more pressure on women to - if they marry or partner with someone, to partner with the right person. Because you cannot have a full career and a full life at home with your children if you are also doing all of the housework and child care.
Why is it braver to be a single mother versus being with a partner? Being in a couple and having a child could be more challenging because there might be conflict if the male partner cannot understand the extreme attachment a woman feels when she has a child.
If you're a young couple when you start out and are both working, trying to raise children, that is tough.
Who of us is mature enough for offspring before the offspring themselves arrive? The value of marriage is not that adults produce children but that children produce adults.
Thousands of years of human history have shown that the ideal setting for children to grow up is with a mother and a father committed to one another, living together, and sharing the responsibility of raising their children.
Before having children, I think I probably approached work very differently, and you become much more economical and pragmatic about your relationship to it.
I think a man and a woman, on a whole array of issues, including raising children, have differences, and then you work them through.
No opposing quotes found.