The masses will reject any theory, however reasonable it may be, if it lays a restriction upon the appetite.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Christianity has aimed to deliver us from a life determined by nature, from the appetites as actuating us, and so has meant that man should not let himself be determined by appetites.
If the facts are contrary to any predictions, then the hypothesis is wrong no matter how appealing.
Masses are always breeding grounds of psychic epidemics.
As an anti-hunger advocate, I found the perplexity of the obesity problem and the hunger problem existing side-by-side in our increasingly global food system begged further investigation.
Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true.
To me there is nothing that goes against nature. If it seems incomprehensible, it's only because we haven't been able to understand it yet.
I'm not sure what theory is, unless it's the pursuit of fundamental questions.
We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough.
We seem to live in an age where we are quietly appalled by the idea of appetites, whether they be for sex, food or diamonds.
Christianity has aimed to deliver us from a life determined by nature, from the appetites as actuating us, and so has meant that man should not let himself be determined by his appetites.
No opposing quotes found.