Charity separates the rich from the poor; aid raises the needy and sets him on the same level with the rich.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I have seen that traditional approaches to charity and aid don't solve problems of poverty. In fact, too often they create dependence.
Generous people can become more generous as they become richer, giving away vast fortunes to worthwhile causes as Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are doing.
Charity is a very personal equation, like we say charity begins at home. It starts with your immediate help in the house: the people who work for you.
A rich man can afford to be generous to many.
The general idea of the rich helping the poor, I think, is important.
The rich support the poor primarily via taxes.
Anticipate charity by preventing poverty.
Giving a poor person money keeps them poor.
If you don't improve the lives of the poor, it's not charity.
Helping the poor doesn't mean redistributing the wealth. It means removing the breaks that give the wealthy an advantage so huge that big chunks of the nation's income are automatically removed from individual economic competition.