We've never been anti-permanence. We just belief deletion should be the default.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
No policy that does not rest upon some philosophical public opinion can be permanently maintained.
My personal opinion is that if someone writes honestly about war, it will inherently be anti-war.
It would seem, therefore, that this constitutional safeguard may no longer serve its original purpose, especially when, as we learned last year, some acts of perjury may now be acceptable - in this world, at least, if not the next.
I am against the word 'anti' because it's a little bit like 'atheist,' as compared to 'believer.' And an atheist is just as much of a religious man as the believer is.
Unilateral preemption should not in any way be the model for how we conduct international relations.
I also don't have organized religion on Pern. I figured - since there were four holy wars going on at the time of writing - that religion was one problem Pern didn't need.
Society has taught us to suppress certain things and not do certain things.
I believe in persevering. If you persevere, success lies ahead of you.
It is necessary to suppress any extremist actions, on all sides, regardless of their origin.
Homosexuality is anti-humanity.