The missiles come first, and the justifications come second.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We're like Iraq. We're hiding missiles. We've got two missiles in reserve.
America needs to be defended. We need missile defense to better police the skies over the United States.
The first step on the way to victory is to recognize the enemy.
And beyond that, the next issue is how do we guarantee one of these weapons, not necessarily this missile, but nuclear weapons ends up in the hands of Al Qaeda or some other terrorist group.
In the face of terrorism, a united front is one of the strongest weapons.
We live in a dangerous world where rogue nations are developing longer range missiles. We have to make a strong effort at developing defenses against this threat.
In responding to a terrorist attack, there are only two choices - take the fight to the enemy or wait until they hit you again. In my estimation, America chose the first.
Remember, weapons of mass destruction don't mean missiles.
Every success in limiting armaments is a sign that the will to achieve mutual understanding exists, and every such success thus supports the fight for international law and order.
National Missile Defense is of a nature to retrigger a proliferation of weapons, notably nuclear missiles. Everything that goes in the direction of proliferation is a bad direction.