Euclid taught me that without assumptions there is no proof. Therefore, in any argument, examine the assumptions.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.
One cannot really argue with a mathematical theorem.
You can't prove any hypothesis, you can only improve or disprove it.
Rational discussion is useful only when there is a significant base of shared assumptions.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
The early study of Euclid made me a hater of geometry.
When there is a problem, always identify and evaluate your underlying assumptions that may be contributing to the problem or preventing you from seeing the problem clearly.
When a thing is true, there is no need to use any arguments to substantiate it.
We must never assume that which is incapable of proof.
Nothing is proved, all is permitted.