One is that President Clinton, in his first two years of his term, did not govern as he had campaigned.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
In fact, I think that Governor Clinton, when he was running, and President Clinton, when he was serving, actually governed with a wide range of advisors and a perspective that blended the best of ideas from the center and the left.
In the last 100 years only Presidents George H.W. Bush, Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford lost their bids for reelection. President Lyndon Johnson did not run for a second term.
George McGovern - and I campaigned very hard for his election - was not, in the summer of 1971, a strong feminist ally. But he did come around.
When he was running, my thinking was, 'I can't believe my governor is running for president.' By the end of Clinton's first year in office, I was like, 'Wow, I must not be a Democrat.'
If I made a mistake in terms of running for president, the mistake was not in refusing to run in '91.
I never, ever, when I entered this process of running for president of the United States, thought I would be excluded from the debate table. Ever. What does two terms as governor get you?
Ronald Reagan wasn't qualified to be governor, let alone president.
I've noticed that in the U.S., when the president hits the three-year mark in office, he goes into re-election campaigning.
My film about Bush didn't prevent his reelection.
So far the changes in the president in his second term have been mainly of a rhetorical nature.
No opposing quotes found.