When I go home, the last thing I want to do is read about the popular lore of vampires.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I tried, after I wrote 'Twilight,' to read 'The Historian,' because it was the big thing that summer. But I can't read other people's vampires. If it's too close, I get upset; if it's too far away, I get upset. It just makes me very neurotic.
There were no vampires of note in Western literature until about the 18th century. But they tell us where we park our anxieties, whether its over-powerful women, death or damnation. We make our own monsters.
I have always been into the darker side of things and love the mystery and sexiness of vampires.
I don't like vampires personally. I don't know any.
You know, a vampire book is not a book to be the vehicle for big themes and stuff, where sometimes when you're dealing with art or the life of Christ or the oeuvre of Shakespeare, you know, it's a little more ambitious.
For many years I had heard about an underworld consisting of people who act out a vampire fantasy while I was living in New York. Fortunately for me there are also several books on the phenomena.
I'm into the vampire stuff. I think it's really fascinating and interesting. There's a lot of history behind all of that, and if you look into it, it's really interesting stuff.
I've loved vampires for a very long time. In eighth grade, I guess, my research paper was on vampires.
I really like vampire books. I might have a problem.
I read 'Dracula' in high school. I've been around vampires forever.