Enormous slaughter may have been acceptable in previous centuries. It simply isn't acceptable anymore.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
All of us in society are supposed to believe that cruelty to animals is wrong and that it is a good thing to prevent needless suffering. So if that is true, how can meat be acceptable under any but the most extraordinary circumstances, such as perhaps roasting the bird who died flying into a window?
It's a major part of world history that men are trying to kill each other. It's just one slaughter after the other. We talk about it, but no one's really listening.
When I was old enough to realize all meat was killed, I saw it as an irrational way of using our power, to take a weaker thing and mutilate it. It was like the way bullies would take control of younger kids in the schoolyard.
I've always been opposed to slaughtering, eating, and wearing carcasses.
As Brian Urquhart has said quite correctly, I don't think that individual countries in the international community can stand aside and let all of these slaughters continue without doing anything.
Yesterday, we slaughtered them and we will continue to slaughter them.
It is a violation which has obsessed the tyrants of the twentieth century. They do not want simply to kill their opponents, but to liquidate them, to deny that they have ever existed.
Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable.
It has too often been too easy for rulers and governments to incite man to war.
I believe in compulsory cannibalism. If people were forced to eat what they killed, there would be no more wars.