I remember having an argument with Alan, I said the Queen's not just going to call the guy up and send him out to do it. And Alan says, well, how would a monarch give orders to her assassin.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There were websites erected to figure out how to kill Alanis. I just do not need to see this; it's not good for anybody.
I think that the implication of King's assassination has not been fully appreciated.
I think in the corridors of power these dangerous kinds of orders are issued in a much more vague way, passed down two or three levels of command before they're given to the assassin.
The English king's power was curbed by Parliament, though that wasn't always a good thing, as politicians often behave no better than monarchs - there are just more of them.
I've nothing against the Queen personally. I had lunch at the Palace once upon a time.
If you look at the British royal family and take away the scandals and the goofy stuff that's going on, people love to have this king to look up to - the royals are like celebrities.
Authority forgets a dying king.
The Queen is the ultimate dictator.
Sure, I'd take the responsibility of queen any day.
It is to be remedied that the false traitors will suffer no man to come into the king's presence for no cause without bribes where none ought to be had. Any man might have his coming to him to ask him grace or judgment in such case as the king may give.