The fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees that no private property shall be taken for a public use without the payment of just compensation.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Almost any government activity can also be seen as taking property 'without just compensation.' The basic model of an unconstitutional 'taking' would be if the government threw you out of your house.
The Fifth Amendment speaks specifically to denying someone their life and liberty without due process. That is what H.R. 2 does, and I rise in opposition to it. And I rise in opposition because it is important that we preserve lives and we recognize that 40 million-plus are uninsured.
The owners have the right to pay you whatever they want to. They don't have to pay you if they don't want to.
So great moreover is the regard of the law for private property, that it will not authorize the least violation of it; no, not even for the general good of the whole community.
He has called for a repeal of the Fifth Amendment as it affects the right of private property.
When public officials turn to financial gain for official acts, we have no choice but to prosecute.
The right to procreate is not guaranteed, explicitly or implicitly, by the Constitution.
There can be no liberty without the law.
Our private property must be sacrificed.
As we approached our work, my colleagues and I looked to the U.S. Constitution for guidance. It states, 'No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.' No person, no exceptions.