Berkeley hackers liked to see themselves as rebels against soulless corporate empires.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Hackers are breaking the systems for profit. Before, it was about intellectual curiosity and pursuit of knowledge and thrill, and now hacking is big business.
In early 1993, a hostile observer might have had grounds for thinking that the Unix story was almost played out, and with it the fortunes of the hacker tribe.
That was the division in the hacking world: There were people who were exploring it and the people who were trying to make money from it. And, generally, you stayed away from anyone who was trying to make money from it.
I was really fascinated by some of the things happening with Anonymous, the hackers group. I don't necessarily agree with everything they've done, but I thought it was a really interesting use of technology and the fact that there's a whole group of people who can take over systems and fight things from behind the scenes.
Hacking was the only entertainment that would occupy my mind - like a huge video game, but with real consequences. I could have evaded the FBI a lot longer if I had been able to control my passion for hacking.
Well, take the evolution of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. It began as hackers' rights. Then it became general civil liberties of everybody - government stay away.
The workstation-class machines built by Sun and others opened up new worlds for hackers.
A lot of hacking is playing with other people, you know, getting them to do strange things.
All the biggest companies are based on a founder who had a need, hacked it together, and said, 'Hey, other people might want this.'
Hackers are seen as shadowy figures with superhuman powers that threaten civilization.