There would be more sense in insisting on man's limitations because he cannot be a mother than on a woman's because she can be.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
So although women can do anything that men can't do, they can also do something that men can't do, and that is mother their children.
Woman must have her freedom, the fundamental freedom of choosing whether or not she will be a mother and how many children she will have. Regardless of what man's attitude may be, that problem is hers - and before it can be his, it is hers alone.
Being a mother is no longer a liability, and being a woman is no longer a pre-existing condition!
Some men don't have the opportunity to be the type of father they need to be, and I hope my example teaches them to step up.
There's a lot more to being a woman than being a mother, but there's a hell of a lot more to being a mother than most people suspect.
I don't know if there's any change more significant that a human being can make than that of a woman becoming a mother. There's no change more dramatic.
Sometimes the strength of motherhood is greater than natural laws.
Even the notion that women should have children at all is based on the idea that a woman's inherent and most important role is that of mother. Shockingly, men's 'innate' roles are a lot more fun than the ones bestowed on women.
Being a mother is no longer a liability, and being a woman is no longer a pre-existing condition! That's what change looks like.
Just as the Supreme Court has said that women have the right to choose whether or not to be parents, men should also have that right.