I've come to realize that artists and scientists are alike. They go through the same processes using different tools. They are both driven to answer the question, 'What if?'
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The best artists are scientific, and the best scientists are artistic.
Art and science have so much in common - the process of trial and error, finding something new and innovative, and to experiment and succeed in a breakthrough.
The difference between science and the arts is not that they are different sides of the same coin even, or even different parts of the same continuum, but rather, they are manifestations of the same thing. The arts and sciences are avatars of human creativity.
The scientist and the artist are both passionate about their exploration. What leads to my work is that I'm equally an artist and an engineer.
I know there's a creative side to artists to - pardon me - there's a creative side to scientists already, but there may be an artistic side, too, waiting to break free.
Art and science are intrinsically the same except for one thing. The universe is in control of your science, whether it's right or wrong, and the public are in control of your art - if they're going to buy it, if you're going to make a living that way.
I think that an artist is a bit like a computer. He receives information from the world around him and from his past and from his own experiences. And it all goes into the brain.
Artists are definitely, like, under a sort of microscope of scrutiny more than others.
The artist does not illustrate science (but) he frequently responds to the same interests that a scientist does.
Ah, the creative process is the same secret in science as it is in art. They are all the same absolutely.