Whatever happened after the liberation of Krajina, this was in no way a violation of human rights by Croatian authorities.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The Kosovars were granted autonomy at the end of World War II, but then aspiring president Milosevic had the autonomy revoked in 1989, and the Dayton Accords of 1995, which ended the recent war in Bosnia and Croatia, failed to address the issue of Kosovo's status.
The Muslims wanted to reign over the whole of Mostar, then gain ground to the sea and finally create an Islamic state. That is what our Croatians defend themselves against.
The international community is pushing things forward in Bosnia... but it is doing it at expense of the Muslim people. I feel it as an injustice, these are the things that I cannot live with.
Nonviolence worked in Serbia, and it can work in other countries seeking their freedom.
I think no one could have made peace in Bosnia besides Holbrooke.
He was driven by the idea that when Milosevic grabs a part of Bosnia, Croatia should get a piece of it, too.
So as far as Serbia is concerned, it does not have the right to influence the privatization or to claim any property, because Kosovo is a former member of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
I don't think that what's going on in Bosnia is political activity. It's partly political, but it's partly atavistic as well.
There can be no unified southeastern Europe without Yugoslavia, and everything else is a continuation of political blackmail with which the Serb people and Yugoslavia were faced all these years.
I'm not saying it was wrong to intervene in Kosovo.