Violence is not a constitutionally protected right. Damaging property is not a constitutionally protected right; inciting violence is not a constitutionally protected right.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Citizens who live or work near protest sites or marches have every right to be free of violence from protesters, and they should never be subjected to destruction of property.
Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.
Protection of private property is a fundamental right protected in a strong democracy.
You can have bans on assault weapons or whatever weapons you wish, and it's not going to protect from a violent person.
The power to prevent violence is a power that no police force seems to have anywhere in the United States.
Violence is the first refuge of the violent.
The threat or fear of violence should not become an excuse or justification for restricting freedom of speech.
Those who 'abjure' violence can do so only because others are committing violence on their behalf.
Non-violence is not a garment to be put on and off at will. Its seat is in the heart, and it must be an inseparable part of our being.
No opposing quotes found.